Home

The principles and practice of human evolution research: Are we asking questions that can be answered?

Richard SMITH & Bernard WOOD

en Comptes Rendus Palevol 16 (5-6) - Pages 670-679

Published on 30 September 2017

This article is a part of the thematic issue Hominin biomechanics, virtual anatomy and inner structural morphology: From head to toe. A tribute to Laurent Puymerail

The research agenda of paleoanthropology involves many topics and methodologies. Fossil specimens are allocated to species, and those species are assigned to the hominin clade. After that we want to know how they are related to each other, what they ate, how much they weighed, how smart they were, etc. We also want to know about the origin of particular attributes of hominins, such as our delayed growth and development, bipedalism, and language. The data available to answer these complex questions are confounded by fragmentary fossil specimens, small sample sizes, limited opportunities for controlled experimentation, and the inherent limitations of historical data. Also, because many traits are effectively unique to hominins, even observational comparative studies are inevitably limited in what they can tell us, if not impossible to conduct. We explore how these limitations should, but often do not, constrain the questions that paleoanthropologists should attempt to answer.


Keywords:

Palaeoanthropology, Paleontological inference, Epistemology, Philosophy of science, Unique events, Underdetermination, Unconceived alternatives

Download full article in PDF format Order a reprint