Sexual selection according to Darwin: A response to Padian and Horner's interpretation

The interpretation of exaggerated structures in the vertebrate fossil record has been hampered by disagreement over the definition of sexual selection and how it relates to sexual dimorphism. Previous assertions that Darwin placed a requirement of sexual dimorphism on sexual selection are mistaken. Instead, Darwin describes variation within one sex and the exertion of a struggle (expressed as intrasexual competition, intersexual mate choice, or both) as the necessary components of sexual selection. The use of structures by one sex to attract mates or repel rivals for mates occurs independently of any existing sexual differences. Differential mating success is also a requirement of Darwinian sexual selection. Mutual sexual selection is a legitimate concept that was described by Darwin. Sexual selection remains a viable explanatory hypothesis for the presence of exaggerated structures of extinct organisms and need not be dismissed summarily, but should not be employed without support as a default hypothesis.