A new species of Eomyops, Eomyops noeliae, is described. from the locality MT-20A (Morteral section, Magro basin, eastern Spain). It is intermediate in size between the large eomiid, E. hebeiseni, and the small species of the group E. catalaunicus, E. bodvanus and E. oppligeri. The age range is Lower Aragonian. MT-20A is located between deposits that contain Megacricetodon primitivus and M.collongensis. Morphologically, E.noeliae sp. nov. is clearly different from the rest of species of the genus, due to an important reduction of the lingual anteroloph of M1,2,3 and the labial anterolophid of M3. The lower incisor shows two parallel ridges along the enamel like the type species of the genus, E. catalaunicus. This character is basic for the distinction between Eomyops and the North American genus Leptodontomys.
Une nouvelle espèce d’Eomyops, Eomyops noeliae, est décrite de la localité MT-20A (Morteral section, bassin du Magro, Est de l’Espagne). Cette espèce a des dimensions intermédiaires entre le grand éomiidé, E. hebeiseni, et le groupe d’espèces de petite taille, constitué par E. catalaunicus, E. bodvanus et E. oppligeri. L’âge de cette espèce est Aragonien inférieur. MT-20A est localisé entre des dépôts qui contiennent Megacricetodon primitivus et Megacricetodon collongensis. La morphologie d’E.noeliae sp. nov. est différente du reste des espèces du genre, due à une réduction importante de l’anterolophe lingual des M1,2,3 et de l’antérolophide labial de la M3. L’incisive inférieure de cette nouvelle espèce montre deux rides parallèles tout au long de l’émail, comme chez l’espèce type, E. catalaunicus. Ce caractère est très important pour la distinction entre Eomyops et le genre américain, Leptodontomys.
Eomyops, Eomyidae, Rodentia, Lower Miocene, SpainEomyops, Eomyidae, Rongeurs, Miocène inferieur, EspagnepresentedPresented by Philippe TaquetVersion française abrégéeIntroduction
Eomyops est un éomiidé assez rare dans le registre fossile. Il apparaît en peu de localités européennes, et, quand il le fait, ce n’est pas l’élément majoritaire de la faune. Le genre Eomyops fut créé par Engesser [10], pour distinguer le matériel européen d’éomiidés jusqu’à ce moment inclu par Hugueney et Mein [18] dans le genre Leptodontomys Shotwell, 1956. La présence de deux rides parallèles dans les incisives inférieures d’Eomyops et quelques autres caractéristiques de la mandibule sont la base pour la distinction entre ces deux genres.
Le genre comprend quatre espèces: E. catalaunicus[17], E. bodvanus[19], E. oppligeri[9] et E. hebeiseni[20]. La distribution temporelle du genre est comprise entre le Miocène moyen et le Pliocène, zones MN 5/6 à MN 17 [11]. Le registre le plus ancien de ce genre qui est connu avec certitude totale en Europe, correspond à la zone MN5 ou MN6 [20]. Le registre le plus récent correspond à celui de la localité de Schernfeld (MN17) [7] and [13]. Il existe, néanmoins, quelques données qui semblent indiquer la présence de ce genre dans les localités de Theobaldof (Allemagne) [22] et de Sankt Gallen (Suisse) [2]. L’âge attribué à ces localités serait compris entre les zones MN2 et MN3.
Dans la coupe de Morteral (bassin du Magro, Valence, Espagne), nous avons découvert le gisement Morteral-20A, où il y a des restes du genre Eomyops. Le tamisage de plusieurs milliers de kilogrammes de sédiment a fourni une des plus importantes collections connues dans le monde de restes fossiles de ce genre.
Paléontologie systématique
Ordre: Rodentia Bodwich, 1821.
Famille: Eomyidae Winge, 1887.
Genre: Eomyops Engesser, 1979.
Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. (Fig. 1).Derivatio nominis : cette espèce est dédiée à Noelia Ruiz.Holotype : MT20A-323, molaire supérieure isolée, conservée au Musée de Géologie de l’université de Valencia.Hypodigme : 1 Iinf., 3 P4, 18 M1,2, 6 M3, 3 P4, 12 M1,2, 3 M3.Localité-type : Morteral-20A (MT-20A), Aragonien inférieur, dépression du Magro, Valencia, Espagne. Coordonnées UTM 30SXJ933608.Diagnose : Eomyops de taille moyenne, avec un mésolophide mi-long, généralement disposé transversalement. Antérolophide de la M3 absent ou court. Antérolophe lingual des M1,2 absent (54 %) ou très court. Jusqu’à un 35 % des M1,2 possède un mésolophe légèrement divisé.Diagnose différentielle : E.noeliae diffère de toutes les autres espèces du genre par les antérolophes et antérolophides moins développés. En plus, E. noeliae diffère de E. hebeiseni par son mésolophe des M1,2 bilobé. Cette nouvelle espèce diffère de E. oppligeri par sa taille supérieure et par le mésolophide des molaires inférieures, moins développé. E. noeliae diffère de E. catalaunicus principalement par sa taille supérieure, par le mésolophe bilobé des M1,2 et par les mésolophides des molaires inférieures moins développés. Finalement, E. noeliae diffère de E. bodvanus par sa taille supérieure, son mésolophe bilobé des M1,2 et par les mésolophides des M1,2,3 moins développés.Mesures : voir Tableau 1.
Discussion et conclusions
La distribution temporelle des espèces connues du genre Eomyops jusqu’à présent reste comprise entre les zones MN5 et MN17. Il existe quelques rapports sur la présence possible du genre dans la zone MN2/3 [7] and [13]. E.noeliae se trouve à la localité Morteral-20A, niveau situé entre les gisements contenant Megacricetodon primitivus et M.collongensis dans la section de Morteral. C’est pourquoi, l’âge de Morteral-20A et de sa faune associée correspondrait à la transition entre les zones MN4 et MN5.
La taille du matériel d’E. noeliae est intermédiaire entre celle d’E. hebeiseni de la MN5/6 et le reste d’espèces du groupe distribuées entre la MN7 et MN17. La morphologie d’E. noeliae est distincte du reste d’espèces du groupe. Il faut remarquer, entre autres, la forte réduction de l’antérolophe lingual des molaires supérieures et celle de l’antérolophide labial de la M3. Une seule incisive inférieure possède deux minuscules crêtes qui courent en parallèle tout au long de l’émail et qui s’accordent avec celles qui sont décrites par Engesser chez E. aff. catalaunicus de La Grive [10].
Selon Engesser [10], le caractère ridé des incisives inférieures, avec d’autres caractéristiques de la mandibule, est utile pour faire la distinction entre le matériel européen de petits éomiidés bunodontes et le matériel du genre américain Leptodontomys. La présence de ce même caractère en E. noeliae du Miocène inférieur de l’Espagne apporte une importante information pour approfondir l’étude sur l’origine d’Eomyops en Europe.
Faute d’une caractérisation plus précise du matériel d’éomiidés initialement assigné au genre Eomyops des localités de Theobaldof et de Sankt Gallen, la présence d’E. noeliae dans la localité de Morteral-20A représente la mention la plus ancienne du genre en Europe.
Introduction
Eomyops is a rather uncommon eomyid in the fossil record. It appears in some European localities, but never constitutes the main element of the fauna. The genus Eomyops was created by Engesser [10] to distinguish the European material of eomyids that Hugueney and Mein [18] had included in the genus Leptodontomys Shotwell, 1956. The distinctive features in the mandible and the ridges of the lower incisors of Eomyops allowed Engesser to distinguish both taxa. The genus Eomyops comprises four species: E. catalaunicus[17], E. bodvanus[19], E. oppligeri[9] and E. hebeiseni[20]. The temporal range of distribution of the genus extends between the Middle Miocene and the Pliocene (zones MN5/6 to MN17) [7]. Nevertheless, this range could be wider (MN2 or MN3) if we consider the presence of the genus in the localities of Theobaldshof [22] and Sankt Gallen [2].
In this article, the assemblage of Eomyops from the locality of Morteral-20A is described. The material described here shows distinctive features that allow the definition of a new species, E.noeliae.
The section of Morteral, where Morteral-20A is located, is situated in the southeastern part of the Magro Basin (eastern Spain), an intramontane basin established in the Late Cretaceous [25]. All sediments of this basin are continental [25]. In the section of Morteral 12 fossiliferous beds have been found, ranging in age from Lower to Middle Aragonian. The preliminary faunal list of Morteral-20A includes the following taxa: Megacricetodon sp. 2, Fahlbuschia sp., Eumyarion sp. and Glirudinus modestus[24]. Morteral-20A is situated between beds with Megacricetodon primitivus (Freudenthal, 1963) and M.collongensis (Mein, 1958) [25]. The relative position of this locality and the preliminary faunal list allow us to assign Morteral-20A to the Early Aragonian (in the transition between zones MN4/MN5, probably in the MN4 zone).
The nomenclature used in the descriptions of the teeth is that of Fahlbusch [12]. Lengths and widths have been measured as defined by Álvarez-Sierra [1]. Specimens are kept in the “Departamento de Geología” of the University of Valencia, Spain.
Systematic Palaeontology
Order: Rodentia Bodwich, 1821.
Family: Eomyidae Winge, 1887.
Genus: Eomyops Engesser, 1979.
Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. (Fig. 1).Derivatio nominis: this species is named after Noelia Ruiz.Holotype: MT20A-323, isolated upper molar housed in the Geology Museum of Valencia University.Referred material: 1 Iinf., 3 P4, 18 M1,2, 6 M3, 3 P4, 12 M1,2, 3 M3.Type locality: Morteral-20A (MT-20A), Lower Aragonian, Magro basin, Spain. Coordinates UTM 30SXJ933608.Diagnosis: medium-sized Eomyops, with a medium-sized, generally transverse mesolophid. Anterolophid of M3 absent or short. Lingual anteroloph absent in about half the M1,2, very small in the rest. About one third of the M1,2 have a split mesoloph.Differential diagnosis: E. noeliae differs from the other species of the genus by the poor development of the lingual anteroloph of the upper molars and of the labial anterolophid of the M3. It is smaller than E. hebeiseni and larger than the other species. It differs from E. hebeiseni by the split mesoloph of the M1,2. It differs from E. oppligeri by the more reduced mesolophids in the lower molars. It differs from E. catalaunicus by the split mesoloph of the M1,2 and the lesser development of the mesolophid of M1,2,3. Finally, it differs from E. bodvanus by the split mesoloph of the M1,2 and the lesser development of the mesolophids of the lower molars.Measurements: see Table 1.
Description
Iinf: only one specimen is available. The most characteristic feature of this element is the presence of two little ridges along the enamel of the tooth. They are parallel and run from the top to the base of the tooth. Between the two crests a small channel is developed. These crests are slightly displaced toward the right side of the tooth.
D4: this element is much longer than wide, subrectangular. The only tooth shows a very small labial anterolophid. Lingual anterolophid absent. The mesolophid is strongly reduced, nearly absent. Posterolophid very much reduced. It does not reach the entoconid. Hypolophid continuous, connecting the hypoconid and the entoconid.
P4: this element is longer than wide, subquadratic. One out of four specimens shows a very small labial anterolophid. This specimen lacks a lingual anterolophid, whereas the rest lack both the lingual and the labial anterolophid. The mesolophid is very short (1), medium (1) or medium-long (1). The posterolophid is short and thin. It reaches the entoconid in one out of three cases. The crest is partially interrupted near the entoconid in two cases. In one specimen the hypolophid is strongly interrupted and in another two cases it is partially interrupted.
M1,2: these teeth are wider than long. Lingual anterolophid strong and well developed, labial anterolophid long (4) or medium sized (12). Mesolophid short (4), medium-sized (11) or moderately long (3). The mesolophid is directed forwards (1), transversally (15) or backwards (2). The posterolophid joins the hypolophid at a sharp (11) or right angle (6).
M3: posterior side strongly or slightly (2) rounded (4). Length and width are more or less equal, so the teeth seem square except for the reduction of the postero-lingual side. The anterolophid is well developed on its lingual side. On its labial side it is very short (3), even absent in three specimens. Mesolophid short or very short (3), medium sized (2) or moderately long (1). The mesolophid is directed forwards (2), transversally (2) or backwards (2). Hypolophid continuous (3) or partially interrupted (3). This causes the extreme reduction of the fourth syncline, which in three cases nearly joins the third syncline.
P4: this element is much wider than long. The lingual part is shorter than the labial part. Mesoloph short (2) or very short (1), directed forwards (2) or transversally (1). The longitudinal crest is continuous (1), partially interrupted (1) or absent (1). In this last specimen the lingual syncline connects with the second syncline. Mesoloph split into two or more crests, much directed forward. Paracone and metacone slightly displaced to the lingual side, thus forming a small platform in front of the second and third synclines on the labial side.
M1,2: rectangular outline strongly wider than long. Lingual anteroloph absent (7), very weakly developed (5) or well developed (1). The longitudinal crest joins the protocone nearly transverse, so the second syncline is longer than the third syncline. The longitudinal crest is thin and in most cases partially interrupted. Mesoloph short (7), very short (2) or medium sized (5) and directed forward (12) or transversely (2). The mesoloph is slightly forked (5) or simple (9).
M3: shape strongly wider than long. Protocone and paracone are the highest cusps. Lingual anteroloph absent (1) or very short (1). First syncline long and narrow. Mesoloph of medium size (1) or medium-long (3) and directed forward. The mesoloph takes up nearly all the space of the second and third synclines. Longitudinal crest nearly transverse. Lingual syncline directed forwards. Second syncline much longer than third syncline. Fourth syncline reduced and open at the postero-labial side.
Discussion
The dental characters of the genus Eomyops described by Engesser [10] are: “The upper molars show a well-developed lingual anteroloph and the second and fourth synclines extend lingually past the middle of the teeth. The M3/3 are little reduced, M3 generally having a hypolophid. The fourth syncline of the lower molars is well developed in most species. The mesoloph of the upper molars is mostly short, sometimes bifurcated, and anteriorly directed. The lower incisors are crenulated”.
The length/width scatter diagrams of E. noeliae indicate that all elements have a similar size, except the M3 (Fig. 2). This also happens in E. hebeiseni from Chatzloch, where the M3 is the smallest element of the dentition [20]. Fig. 2 shows the range of measurements of the elements of E. hebeiseni and E. noeliae nov. sp.. The M3/3 are not very much reduced, especially the M3. The latter is longer than the M3 in E. hebeiseni and in E. noeliae, while both the M3 from Morteral-20A and from Chatzloch [20] are, more or less, as wide as the M3.
The lingual anteroloph in E. noeliae is not as well developed as described in Engesser's characterization of the genus[10] and [11]. While the lingual anteroloph is mostly well developed in E. hebeiseni, E. oppligeri, E. catalaunicus and E. bodvanus, in E. noeliae the lingual anteroloph is mainly absent.
The development of the second and fourth synclines, extending lingually past the middle of the teeth, is very common in E. noeliae.
The development of the hypolophid of the M3 is variable. At least in three specimens (50%) this crest is partially interrupted. The rest has a weak and continuous hypolophid.
Engesser figured a fragment of a lower incisor of E. aff. catalaunicus from La Grive that presents two ridges in the underside of the tooth [10]. He distinguished this character as representative of European populations of Eomyops. Among the remains of E. noeliae from Morteral-20A there is a lower incisor with this morphology (Fig. 1R, S, T). The lower incisor from Morteral-20A is complete, so this character can be studied. The two ridges extend throughout the enamel all along the tooth. It consists of two small parallel crests. The highest of these two crests is very small and draws a small channel from the base of the tooth until its apex. This character is not commonly mentioned in the literature, but may be an excellent feature to distinguish the genus Eomyops. After the revision of all the rodent incisors in Morteral-20A, no other incisor with two ridges has been found. Although important in some cases, as can be observed in Eomyops, incisors are usually not studied in fossil collections. Therefore, diagnostic characters based on incisors are seldom utilized for the distinction between taxa at the generic level. Nevertheless, in Eomyops they can be helpful to distinguish the material of this genus from the rest of rodents.
Throughout the chronological range of distribution, the morphology of the teeth of Eomyops is very conservative [8]. The four described species of the genus show great similarities in the morphology. Biometrically, the species of Eomyops are clearly distributed in two groups. A first one is composed by small-sized species: E. catalaunicus, E. bodvanus and E. oppligeri and E. noeliae. The other one comprises only E. hebeiseni, of larger size.
The temporal distribution of E. hebeiseni covers zones MN5 and MN6; E. oppligeri occurs in zones MN7 and probably MN6, MN8 and MN14; E. catalaunicus occurs in zone MN9 and MN10, and probably in MN13 and MN14, and E. bodvanus in MN14 and perhaps MN15. In the German locality of Schernfeld (MN17 a few teeth that represent the youngest record of this genus [8] have been found.
Based on the published literature, we have compared the material of Eomyops from Morteral-20A with that from the type localities of the different species of the genus. For the morphological and biometrical comparison of our material, we follow the chronological order of the different species of the genus Eomyops (E. hebeiseni – E. oppligeri – E. catalaunicus – E. bodvanus).
Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 represent the ranges of several parameters of the dentition of Eomyops species from various European localities. The size of E. noeliae is intermediate between the larger E. hebeiseni and the smaller E. oppligeri, E. catalaunicus and E. bodvanus.
There is no overlap of the measurements with E. hebeiseni, only the maximum length values of the M1,2 and the M1,2 of E. noeliae are near the minimum values of E. hebeiseni. This does not happen with lower and upper P4, but those elements are less numerous.
E.oppligeri from Anwil is smaller than E. noeliae, but the biometrical differences are not always evident. The length of lower and upper P4 and width of first and second lower and upper molars do not overlap. In these cases E. noeliae is clearly larger than E. oppligeri. On the contrary, minimum length values of first and second lower and upper molars of E. noeliae overlap with maximum values of first and second lower and upper molars of E. oppligeri, and the values for the width of P4 come very close. In the case of the upper molars, the values are clearly separated for all the measured parameters, except for the length of the M1,2. In this case, the extreme length values of the M1,2 of E. oppligeri match with the minimum ones of E. noeliae from MT-20A.
The material of E. catalaunicus from the type locality, Can Llobateres, is very scarce. So, the comparison of measurements between both populations is difficult. While all parameters of the upper molars in E. noeliae have quite higher values than in E. catalaunicus, the size of the lower molars is more similar. In the M1,2 the maximum values of E. catalaunicus overlap the minimum values of E. noeliae. In the P4, the only specimen from Can Llobateres has the same width value as medium-sized specimens from MT-20A.
As in the case of E. catalaunicus, the material of E. bodvanus from its type locality is very scarce. Only the first and second lower and upper molars can be compared biometrically. There is no overlap between the populations of E. bodvanus and E. noeliae. Only the lengths of the first and second lower and upper molars of both species are similar (the maximum values of E. bodvanus are close to the minimum values of E. noeliae).
In the M1,2 of E. noeliae the lingual anteroloph is absent (54%), very weak (38%) or of short-medium size (8%= 1 specimen). The M3 of E. noeliae is represented by two teeth. One specimen lacks the lingual anteroloph and the other one has a weak anteroloph. On the contrary, in the M1,2 of E. hebeiseni from Chatzloch predominate morphotypes with well-developed lingual anteroloph (50%) [20]. In Chatzloch, all specimens (4) of M3 have anterolophs [20]. The other species have a well-developed lingual anteroloph in all upper molars.
The mesoloph of the M1,2 of E. noeliae is short or very short in 64% of the teeth, and of medium size in the rest. The length of mesolophs in the other species of the genus is similar. Only in E. hebeiseni, this crest is moderately long and simple [20]. A remarkable fact is the bifurcation of the mesoloph of M1,2. While E. noeliae and E. oppligeri have specimens with a clear division of the mesoloph (36% in E. noeliae), in the rest of the species this crest is always single.
Another important morphological difference between E. noeliae and the other species is the development of the labial anterolophid of M3; in E. noeliae it is weak in three specimens and absent in the other three; this crest it is well developed in E. hebeiseni[20], E. oppligeri, E. catalaunicus and E. bodvanus.
On the another hand, the development of the mesolophid of the lower molars of E. noeliae is clearly different from the other species. In E. noeliae this crest is short or medium sized in 83% of the M1,2 and in all M3, E. oppligeri, E. catalaunicus and E. bodvanus have a long or moderately long mesolophid. In the M1,2 of E. noeliae the mesolophid is directed forwards (1; 6%), transversally (15; 83%) or backwards (2; 11%) and in the M3 directed forwards, transversally or backwards in the same proportion. In the rest of species of the genus, this crest is directed backwards or transversally.
Kälin [20] lists all localities that have yielded Eomyops in western and central Europe. Four of these localities are located in the Iberian Peninsula (Can Llobateres, Las Planas 5K, Manchones and Arroyo del Val 6). Can Llobateres is the type locality of E.catalaunicus, and the rest of the localities contain a material determined as Eomys sp. [8], Leptodontomys (Eomyops) sp. [13] or L. (Eomyops) aff. catalaunicus[14] in Manchones and Leptodontomys (Eomyops) sp. [13] or L. (Eomyops) aff. catalaunicus[14] in Arroyo del Val 6 [14]. Posteriorly, the material from Las Planas 5K and Manchones is attributed to E.catalaunicus[5] and [6]. Las Planas 5K, Manchones and Arroyo del Val 6 contain M.crusafonti and are assigned to the Aragonian biozone G2 (MN6) [5] and [6]. On the other hand, in Can Llobateres M.ibericus[15] and [16] has been identified, so this site has been assigned to biozone MN9. In spite of the scarcity of material of these localities, the morphological differences of these populations as compared with E. noeliae are based on the same features described before for the type localities of each species. Recently, in the section of “Abocador de Can Mata”, near Can Llobateres (Vallés-Penedés basin), new localities with Eomyops material, provisionally determined as E. cf. oppligeri[4] have been found.
So far, the oldest species of the genus Eomyops was E. hebeiseni from Chatzloch [20] and the youngest E. bodvanus from the Pliocene of central Europe [19]. Nevertheless, there are some data indicating the probable presence of this genus in older deposits of central Europe [2] and [22]. The presence of Eomyops in deposits earlier than zone MN5 is uncertain. The best known Eomyops assemblages correspond to an age range between MN5 and MN17 (Middle Miocene to Late Pliocene).
During many years, the small bunodont eomyids known from some Middle and Upper Miocene localities of Europe had been considered to belong to the North American genus Leptodontomys[18] and [23]. Some differences in morphology lead Engesser [10] to assign the European material of Leptodontomys to the new genus Eomyops. These differences are the presence of two ridges in the lower incisors and other slight differences in the mandible.
Some authors have considered the differences between Eomyops and Leptodontomys not significant enough to justify the existence of two separate genera [3], [7] and [23]. The decision of creating a new genus ultimately depends on the importance assigned to the diagnostic characters distinguishing each genus. The morphological similarities between Leptodontomys and Eomyops are evident. If we accept the fact that the description of the Eomyops material in Europe has been based on the study of each one of the dental elements, including incisors, the difference between Leptodontomys and Eomyops in the lower incisors is also undeniable.
The presence of two ridges in the lower incisor is now known in two assemblages: La Grive [10] and MT-20A (in the other assemblages the lower incisor is not known) and this enforces Engesser's view that Eomyops and Leptodontomys are different genera. So far no crenulation has been described in the lower incisors of Leptodontomys. The North American record of Leptodontomys extends between the Arikareean (Upper Oligocene) [3] and [21] and the Clarendonian (Upper Miocene) [26].
In China, Qiu [23] reports the occurrence of Leptodontomys aff. gansus and Leptodontomys sp. nov. 2 in the Middle Miocene locality of Tunggur, Leptodontomys sp. nov. 1 in the Lufeng site and L.gansus in Harr Obo, Ertemte and Songshan. These last three localities and Lufeng have been attributed to the Upper Miocene. No crenulated incisors have been described in any of the Chinese assemblages studied [23]. According to Qiu, the presence of Eomyops (Leptodontomys selon Qiu) in Europe would be due to the migration of Leptodontomys from North America to Europe through Asia. If this hypothesis is true, Leptodontomys should be present in the basins of the Asiatic migratory route proposed by Qiu in the Lower Miocene or earlier. However, the first record in China of Leptodontomys in the locality of Tunggur is younger than the first Eomyops record in Europe.
The Leptodontomys record in the Chinese continental basins is fragmentary and probably still incomplete [23]. If Eomyops is a descendant of Leptodontomys, and if the latter migrated to Europe through the Asiatic route, new occurrences of Leptodontomys in the Asiatic basins in deposits older than Tunggur are to be expected. If, on the contrary, the Leptodontomys record in China and other possible continental areas connecting Europe and North America were not older than Middle Miocene, the presence of E.noeliae in Lower Miocene deposits in southern Europe would support Engesser's hypothesis about an independent evolution of Eomyops and Leptodontomys in the European and American continent respectively.
Conclusions
The E.noeliae assemblage from the locality of Morteral-20 A contains the greatest collection of fossil remains of the genus Eomyops in the Iberian Peninsula and represents the first true report worldwide of this genus in zone MN4.
The size of this new eomyid species is intermediate between the large E.hebeiseni and the group of small species composed by E.catalaunicus, E.oppligeri and E.bodvanus. Thus, there is no clear trend of size increase or decrease among the species assigned to the genus.
The degree of development of the lingual anteroloph of the upper molars and the lingual anterolophid of the M3 represents a significant difference with the rest of Eomyops species. The conservative character of the Eomyops morphology made the distinction between species of the group particularly difficult. So far, few or no differences could be established between the representatives of the genus.
The presence of two ridges in the lower incisors of E.noeliae makes this morphological character one of the most important to distinguish between Eomyops and Leptodontomys.
The presence of Eomyops in paleontological sites of zone MN4 adds new information to the analysis of the origin of the genus in Europe and extends the temporal range of the distribution of Eomyops.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Valencia Government (“Conselleria de Cultura I Esports”) for a fieldwork grant (2001). This study was supported by the projects GVA06/304 and GVPRE/2008/320 of the Valencia Government. The photographs were made using the Hitachi S-4100 Scanning Electron Microscope of the “Servei Central de Suport a la Investigació Cientifica” of the University of Valencia. We want to thank to Jordi Guillem for his revision of the English version and Dr. P. Mein and an anonymous reviewer for their comments and criticism.
Álvarez-SierraM.A.Estudio sistemático y bioestratigráfico de los Eomyidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) del Oligoceno superior y Mioceno inferior español8619881–207T. Bolliger, Kleinsäugerstratigraphie in der miozänen Hörnlischüttung (Ostschweiz), in: H.J. Gregor and H.J. Unger (Eds.), Kleinsäuger aus der Miozänmolasse der Ostschweiz, Documenta naturae, München, 1992, pp. 1–296.BurkeJ.J.New Duchesne River rodents and a preliminary survey of the Adjidaumidae231934391–398I. Casanovas-Vilar, The rodent assemblages from the Late Aragonian and the Vallesian (Middle to Late Miocene) of the Vallès-Penedès basin (Catalonia, Spain), PhD, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain (2007) (282 p.).R. Daams, M. Freudenthal, A.J. van der Meulen Ecostratigraphy of micromammal faunas from the Neogene of Spain, Scripta Geológica Spec. Issue 1 (1988) 287–302.R. Daams, M. Freudenthal Synopsis of the Dutch-Spanish collaboration program in the Aragonian type area, 1975–1986, Scripta Geológica Spec. Issue 1 (1988) 3–18.DehmR.Altpleistozäne Säuger von Schernfeld bei Eichstätt in Bayern2196217–61de BruijnH.Gliridae, Sciuridae y Eomyidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) miocenos de Calatayud (provincia de Zaragoza, España) y su relación con la bioestratigrafía del área781967187–373EngesserB.Die obermiozäne Säugetierfauna von Anwil (Baselland)28197237–363EngesserB.Relationships of some insectivores and rodents from the Miocene of North America and Europe1419791–68B. Engesser Family Eomyidae, in: G.E. Rössner and K. Heissig (Eds.), Land Mammals of Europe, Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, 1999, pp. 319–335.FahlbuschV.Populationsverschiebungen bei tertüiren Nagetieren, eine Studie an oligozänen und miozänen Eomyidae Europas, Bayerische Akademie Der Wissenschaften Mathermatisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse14519701–136FahlbuschV.Die stammesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Eomyiden (Mammalia, Rodentia) Nordamerikas und Europas131973141–175FahlbuschV.Die Eomyiden (Rodentia, Mammalia) der Oberen Süsswasser-Molasse Bayerns15197563–90HartenbergerJ.L.Les Cricetidae (Rodentia) de Can Llobateres (Néogène d’Espagne)71965487–498HartenbergerJ.L.Contributions à l’étude de l’anatomie crânienne des Rongeurs. I.- Principaux types de Cricétodontinés1196747–64HartenbergerJ.L.Les rongeurs du Vallésien (Miocène supérieur) de Can Llobateres (Sabadell, Espagne): Gliridae et Eomyidae81966596–604HugueneyM.MeinP.Les Eomyidés (Mammalia, Rodentia) néogènes de la Région lyonnaise11968187–204JánossyD.Middle Pliocene Microvertebrate Fauna from the Osztramos Loc. 1 (Northern Hungary)64197227–52KälinD.Eomyops hebeiseni n. sp., a new large Eomyidae (Rodentia, Mammalia) of the Upper Freshwater Molasse of Switzerland901997629–637KorthW.W.BaileyB.E.Additional specimens of Leptodontomys douglassi (Eomyidae, Rodentia) from the Arikareean (Late Oligocene) of Nebraska731992651–662MoayedpourE.Geologie und Paläontologie des tertiären “Braunkohlenlagers” von Theobaldshof/Rhön (Miozän, Hessen)7619771–135QiuZ.TomidaY.LiC.K.SetoguchiT.Rodent and Lagomorph Families of Asian Origins and Diversification1994National Science Museum MonographsTokyo49–55F.J. Ruiz-Sánchez Estudio paleontológico de los roedores fósiles del Mioceno inferior de la cuenca del río Magro (Valencia), PhD thesis, University of Valencia, Spain (1999).(395 p., unpublished).F.J. Ruiz-Sánchez, C. de Santisteban, J.I. Lacomba Nuevas faunas de roedores fósiles (Mammalia, Rodentia) de edad Aragoniense inferior y medio en la serie del Barranco de Morteral (cuenca del río Magro, prov. De Valencia, España), COL-PA 1 (2003) 579–594.SmithK.S.First Record of Leptodontomys (Rodentia: Eomyidae) in the Clarendonian (Miocene) of the Southern Great Plains85200547–53
Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. from MT-20A, Magro Basin. A. Left P4, MT-20A 342. B. Right D4, MT-20A 344. C. Right M1,2, MT-20A 312. D. Right M1,2, MT-20A 316. E. Left M1,2, MT-20A 318. F. Left M3, MT-20A 319. G. Right M3, MT-20A 320. H. Left M3, MT-20A 321. I. Left P4, MT-20A 326. J. Right P4, MT-20A 327. K. Left P4, MT-20A 359. L. left M1,2, MT-20A 322. M. Left M1,2, MT-20A 323 (holotype). N. Right M1,2, MT-20A 324. O. Right M1,2, MT-20A 325. P. Right M3, MT-20A 368. Q. Right M3, MT-20A 369. R. Crenulation I inf, MT-20A 373, external view. S. Crenulation I inf, MT-20A 373, external view. T. Crenulation I inf, MT-20A 373, external view. Scale=1 mm.
Fig. 1. Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. de MT-20A, bassin de Magro. A. P4 gauche, MT-20A 342. B. D4 droite, MT-20A 344. C. M1,2 droite, MT-20A 312. D. M1,2 droite, MT-20A 316. E. M1,2 gauche, MT-20A 318. F. M3 gauche, MT-20A 319. G. M3 droite, MT-20A 320. H. M3 gauche, MT-20A 321. I. P4 gauche, MT-20A 326. J. P4 droite, MT-20A 327. K. P4 gauche, MT-20A 359. L. M1,2 gauche, MT-20A 322. M. M1,2 gauche, MT-20A 323 (holotype). N. M1,2 droite, MT-20A 324. O. M1,2 droite, MT-20A 325. P. M3 droite, MT-20A 368. Q. M3 droite, MT-20A 369. R. Crénulation I inf, MT-20A 373, vue latérale. S. Crénulation I inf, MT-20A 373, vue latérale. T. Crénulation I inf, MT-20A 373, vue latérale. Échelle = 1 mm.
Compared measurements of the dental elements of Eomyops noeliae from Morteral-20A and Eomyops hebeiseni[20] from Chatzloch.
Fig. 2. Mesures comparées des éléments dentaires d’Eomyops noeliae de la localité Morteral-20A et Eomyops hebeiseni[20] de la localité Chatzloch.
Ranges of variation of several parameters of the lower molars of Eomyops noeliae from Morteral-20A, Eomyops hebeiseni from Chatzloch, Eomyops oppligeri from Anwil, Eomyops catalaunicus from Can Llobateres and Eomyops bodvanus from Osztramos 1.
Fig. 3. Variation de quelques paramètres des molaires inférieures de la dentition de Eomyops noeliae de Morteral-20A, Eomyops hebeiseni de Chatzloch, Eomyops oppligeri d’Anwil, Eomyops catalaunicus de Can Llobateres et Eomyops bodvanus d’Osztramos 1.
Ranges of variation of several parameters of the upper molars of Eomyops noeliae from Morteral-20A, Eomyops hebeiseni from Chatzloch, Eomyops oppligeri from Anwil, Eomyops catalaunicus from Can Llobateres and Eomyops bodvanus from Osztramos 1.
Fig. 4. Variation de quelques paramètres des molaires supérieures de la dentition de Eomyops noeliae de Morteral-20A, Eomyops hebeiseni de Chatzloch, Eomyops oppligeri d’Anwil, Eomyops catalaunicus de Can Llobateres and Eomyops bodvanus d’Osztramos 1.
Measurements (tenths of millimeters) of the lower and upper teeth of Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. from Morteral-20A.
Tableau 1. Mesures (en dixièmes de millimètres) des dents inférieures et supérieures d’Eomyops noeliae sp. nov. de Morteral-20A.