The Couderousse Member of the Blacourt Formation in the Banc-Noir quarry, Ferques inlier, Boulonnais (Pas-de-Calais, France) has yielded a tooth plate whose morphology is similar to that of Synthetodus, which is considered a holocephalan. Its histology is made of an outer enameloid-like tissue, and an inner trabecular dentine. Its occlusal surface shows a bean-shaped bulge. This tooth plate was prepared from a limestone that is dated from the Middle–Upper varcus Conodont Zone, that is lower upper Givetian. This limestone has also yielded a Pokorninella bricae–Rothpletzella–Tentaculites assemblage, which is indicative of an environment of the inner to middle marine platform boundary. This specimen appears to be the oldest confirmed holocephalan (‘bradyodont’) tooth plate for which the name Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. is erected.
Au sein du massif de Ferques (Boulonnais, Pas-de-Calais, France), le membre de Couderousse de la formation de Blacourt dans la carrière du Banc-Noir a fourni un pavé dentaire dont la morphologie est proche de celle de Synthetodus, qui est considéré comme un holocéphale. Son histologie présente une couche externe de type émailloïde et une couche interne de dentine trabéculaire. Sa surface occlusale porte une protubérance en forme de haricot. Ce pavé dentaire a été dégagé d’un calcaire qui est daté de la zone de conodonte moyenne à supérieure à varcus, c’est-à-dire de la partie inférieure du Givétien supérieur. Ce calcaire a également produit un assemblage de microfossiles calcaires à Pokorninella bricae–Rothpletzella–Tentaculites, qui indique un environnement en limite de plate-forme marine interne et moyenne. Ce spécimen apparaît comme étant le plus ancien holocéphale (« bradyodonte ») confirmé. Il est attribué à Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp.
Banc-Noir quarry, Ferques inlier, Blacourt Formation, Givetian, Trabecular dentine, New genus and species, FranceCarrière du Banc-Noir, Massif de Ferques, Formation de Blacourt, Givétien, Dentine trabéculaire, Nouveau genre et nouvelle espèce, FrancepresentedPresented by Philippe TaquetNomenclatorial foreword
As one of the referees of this paper said, the vernacular English name of the Superorder Holocephali (sensu[29]) is generally written ‘holocephalans’ (see, e.g., http://www.wordreference.com/enfr/holocephalan) rather than ‘holocephalians’. However, the latter is more and more often found in literature (e.g., [13] and [29] and http://www.thefreedictionary.com/holocephalian). Here, we use ‘holocephalans’, except when, in references, authors have written ‘holocephalians’.
Introduction
The holocephalan fishes are chondrichthyans, characterized, among other characters, by the slow growth of their teeth; thus they are often referred to as ‘bradyodonts’. For instance, chimaeroids do not shed tooth plates that are growing from their lingual surface [26]. Palaeozoic holocephalans are mostly known from isolated teeth or tooth plates. Their remains are quite common and diversified in the Carboniferous, with a few taxa represented during the Late Devonian [29]. Some of the teeth or tooth plates of Devonian age show an already typical holocephalan histology, including orthotrabeculine, trabecular dentine, and a lamellar basal layer [29]. Here, we show evidence of a holocephalan occurrence in the Middle Devonian of the Boulonnais, northern France. However, its histology differs from the typical holocephalan one.
In northern France and Belgium, many holocephalan remains, mostly represented by tooth plates, are Carboniferous in age [7]. Only one doubtful mention concerns a cochliodont tooth from the Middle Devonian [9] and [10], hence the interest of our discovery. We first briefly review the pre-Carboniferous holocephalans worldwide in order to settle our discovery in its global context.
After the review by B. Stahl [29] and subsequent publications, Late Devonian holocephalans include the following taxa:
Helodontiformes: Helodus clivulus, H. devonicus, H. incipiens and H. rowleyi Branson 1914, uppermost Devonian, Grassy Creek Shales, Missouri, USA; H. subtuberatus Lambe 1913, ?Upper Devonian, Alberta, Canada; H. gibberulus Agassiz 1838, Upper Devonian, Pennsylvania, USA. However, Helodus sp. figured by B. Stahl [29, fig. 56] from the Upper Devonian (Famennian) Teddy Mount Formation of Queensland, Australia, is in fact of Early Carboniferous age (after S. Turner in [13]);
Cochliodontiformes: Sandalodus minor Davis 1884, Upper Famennian, lower Chaffee Formation, Colorado, USA; Thoralodus cabrieri Lehman 1952, Famennian, Cabrières, Montagne Noire, southern France; Psephodus cf. magnus Agassiz 1838, middle Famennian, Kowala quarry, Holy Cross mountains, Poland [13]; and a record of Cochliodus sp. from Sort Tepe, Hakkari province, southeastern Turkey (Zap fauna in [17], pl. 2 : 4) whose age is not clear: the Zap fauna comes from the basal Köprülü Formation – not the Yiginli Formation as erroneously indicated in [17]: P. Janvier, pers. comm. 1984 – which is considered latest Famennian in age, but the cochliodont specimen has been collected from an isolated block of a reefal limestone, higher in the Köprülü Formation, which is dated from the Tournaisian [17 (p. 162)]. Specimens referred with question to Psephodus from the Upper Devonian of Australia are mentioned by B. Stahl [29] after S. Turner [30]; in fact, this is based on the following information: “teeth which might belong to this genus have been found in the Late Devonian of Western Australia (J.A. Long, pers. comm.)” [30], and this record has still to be considered as doubtful;
Psammodontiformes: Psammodus sp., uppermost Devonian, central Alborz, Iran ;
Copodontiformes: Acmoniodus clarkei Hussakof & Bryant 1918, lower Frasnian, Lower Genesee, New York, USA; Synthetodus trisulcatus Eastman 1896 and S. calvini Eastman 1908, lower Frasnian, Iowa, USA ;
in the Upper Devonian (probably Famennian), Witpoort Formation of eastern Cape Province, South Africa, Anderson et al. [1] have interpreted a series of connected skeletal elements “as the earliest known whole-bodied holocephalian”; however, the neurocranium and palatoquadrate of this fish are not fused, and no teeth or tooth plates are preserved, thus it is not considered an holocephalan [29];
Only few remains referred to as holocephalans have been recorded from the Middle Devonian, but they are considered as questionable [29]:
Psammodus antiquus Newberry 1857 (Eifelian, Ohio, USA), based on a specimen that is incompletely described and not figured;
a small spine “associated with the Psephaspis dorsal disc on [the specimen] PF 5675” (Middle Devonian, Idaho, USA), and considered as menaspid-like by R. Denison [6];
a number of “peculiar symmetrical endoskeletal elements” described as Pucapampella rodrigae[16], from the Givetian of Bolivia, have been originally interpreted as holocephalan synarcuals, though they might as well have belonged to non-holocephalan batoid-like chondrichthyans [29]; since its discovery, new specimens of this taxon have been collected; the cranial morphology of Pucapampella includes characters that are absent in other chondrichthyans, thus it is now considered “as a cladistically basal member” of the chondrichthyans [21].
Additionally, Dormal [9] and [10] has mentioned, but did not figure a cochliodont tooth (referred to as “Cochliodon: Dent” in [9]; “Cochliodonte: Dent” in [10]) from the Alvaux limestone of the Namur Synclinorium, Belgium. This limestone was considered Eifelian in age at that time [7]. This mention is not confirmed, and the age of the Alvaux limestone is Givetian, not Eifelian (now the Alvaux Member of the Bois de Bordeaux Formation [3] and [4]).
Therefore, the tooth plate that is presented here is assumed to represent the earliest confirmed representative of the Holocephali sensu[29]. It is also the oldest chondrichthyan remain from the Boulonnais [8], except for a very doubtful Petrodus[5]. To be sure of the age of the new tooth plate, thin sections have been made in its limestone matrix in order to prepare microfossils for independent biochronologic evidence.
Stratigraphy and environment
The sample where the specimen comes from is a hard, grey ochreous limestone, with granular patches due to bioturbations. It has been collected by Mr. Christian Loones, an amateur palaeontologist who works with the Natural History Museum of Lille (Nord, France). It comes from the Banc-Noir quarry (Ferques inlier, Pas-de-Calais), in the Couderousse Member, upper part of the Blacourt Formation (Fig. 1). This member is dated from the Middle-Upper varcus Conodont Zone, i.e. lower upper Givetian [2]. The Blacourt Formation has been interpreted as a lagoon-like restricted environment, as suggested by the low density of chitinozoan, acritarch and prasinophycean assemblages [18] and [24]. Ostracodes suggest that the environment was either lagoon-like or marine, but of shallow water [22].
Thin sections have been made in the matrix of the holocephalan specimen in order to control the age of the limestone, and obtain additional palaeoenvironmental information. The microfacies revealed by these thin sections shows patches of bioclastic bioturbated packstone, in a sandy micritic mudstone. It bears numerous and rather diversified metazoan fragments, dominated by ostracodes and indicative of a relatively deep environment, such as rather common crinoids; relatively abundant ostracodes with rare Cryptophyllus sp.; rare bivalve elements with a microperforated periphery belonging to cortoid grain (sensu[12]); rare and strongly abraded bryozoans; rare brachiopod shells, with very rare Reticulariacea and Productella spines; relatively common but broken fragments of Tentaculites sp.; rare to relatively common trilobite elements; very rare phosphatic remains (fish); palaechinid radioles and minute fragments of the cyanobacteria Rothpletzella (=Sphaerocodium auct.) sp. and of Pokorninella bricae[31]. This assemblage is suggestive of an environment from the inner to middle platform boundary, a little below the FWWB (fair-weather waves base), that is at more or less 25 to 50 m of depth.
The co-occurrence of Pokorninella bricae Vachard 1988 (synonym: Moravammina sp. sensu Poncet 1988) [27], Rothpletzella and Tentaculites regionally dates the middle–upper Givetian. In the Boulonnais, this assemblage has been originally described in the Griset Member of the Blacourt Formation (Lower to Middle varcus Conodont Zone) [31]. So, the occurrence of this assemblage in the Couderousse Member (middle–upper varcus Conodont Zone, i.e. lower Upper Givetian), which is stratigraphically just above the Griset Member, extends its range slightly higher in the local stratigraphic sequence.
Systematics
Class Chondrichthyes Huxley 1880
Subclass Subterbranchialia Zangerl 1979
Superorder Holocephali Bonaparte 1832–41
Order Copodontiformes Obruchev 1953
Family Copodontidae Davis 1883
Copodontidae incertae sedis
Melanodus nov. gen.
Derivatio nominis: From ‘melan’ black and ‘odus’ tooth.
Type and only species: Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp.
Diagnosis: As for the type species.
Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp.
Derivatio nominis: Dedicated to Mr. Christian Loones, an amateur palaeontologist working with the Natural History Museum of Lille, who discovered the specimen.
Holotype and only specimen: MGL 1244 in the collections of geology (‘Musée Gosselet’) of the Natural History Museum of Lille (Nord, France) (Fig. 2).
Diagnosis : A holocephalan incomplete tooth plate; mostly rectangular in outline, with regularly curved mesial-distal margins in occlusal view; 18 mm wide, and ca. 30 mm long (evaluation); the occlusal surface of the crown shows a typical bean-shaped bulge; the crown is made of two mineralized tissues, i.e., an outer irregularly punctuated enameloid-like layer and an inner trabecular dentine (osteodentine) layer.
Description
The specimen MGL 1244 is a single isolated tooth plate, with a low, mesio-distally elongated crown, corresponding to a crushing tooth. It is 18 mm wide and 24 mm long, 2.5 to 10 mm high. Its mesial or distal side (right side on Fig. 2A) is broken while the others are eroded. The occlusal surface is characterized by an inclined bean-shaped bulge that represents nearly 10% of the surface. Its highest point is not centrally located (Fig. 2A). The whole surface of the specimen is punctuated with small irregular holes. These foramina are often smaller on the bulge than on its lateral parts. They are often fused and interconnected (Fig. 2D and E). The surface seems to be covered by a thick layer of an enameloid-like tissue (Fig. 2G), which otherwise is considered as diagnostic for the Copodontiformes [29]. The basal part is strongly eroded, and reveals a histological structure interpreted as trabecular dentine (osteodentine). However, the basal lamellar layer present in ancient holocephalans is absent from our specimen. Because our specimen is unique, we did not proceed with thin sections of the tooth plate, and the histology has not been studied in detail.
When observed in a SEM, crossed linear striations are seen all over the occlusal surface of the tooth plate (Fig. 2C–F). Two main orientations can be detected, and their density seems to be higher on the bulge (Fig. 2D and F) than on the other parts of the specimen. Furthermore, some are not linear and other are deeper, corresponding to the most recent ones. All those striations may be related to the animal diet (grinding of benthic shells) and/or to the occurrence of sand grains from the substrate where their benthic preys were living [32]. This has been quantitatively evaluated for the stickleback fish Gaterosteus aculeatus[28]. However, in the latter case, the microwear concerned the pointed teeth on a living fish, which is different from our tooth plate that has been subject to post-mortem transportation (see [15]).
Discussion
This new specimen of a “bradyodont” tooth plate is morphologically similar to some of the tooth plates of Synthetodus trisulcatus from the Lower Frasnian of Iowa, USA, which also have a bean-shaped bulge [29 (fig. 91C and D)]. However, S. trisulcatus shows asymmetrical or bilaterally symmetrical teeth [11], a feature that cannot be seen on our single, broken tooth plate. The sizes of Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. and of Synthetodus are very similar as well (24 mm and 23–26 mm respectively). However, regarding its thickness, Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. is more mesio-distally elongated than the corresponding teeth of Synthetodus. It is also different from all the other tooth plates of holocephalans reviewed by B. Stahl [29].
As to the wear surface, we compared the tooth from the Boulonnais with both Synthetodus calvini and S. trisulcatus. This kind of tooth was first attributed to the Ctenodipterini dipnoans (including Dipterus) by C. Eastman [11], because it corresponds to large and worn tritorial plates. However, Hussakof and Bryant [14] advocated three reasons for excluding Synthetodus from the dipnoans; i.e. (1) its teeth present no ridges nor tubercles, (2) they are bilaterally symmetrical, and (3) they are covered with a shiny enamel sprinkled with small punctae. They proposed to include Synthetodus within the Cochliodontidae. Later, C. Patterson [25] considered Synthetodus as a typical copodont, with a single cusp and a bilaterally symmetrical tooth. This author, however, thinks that the Copodontiformes have a doubtful phylogenetic relationship to other holocephalans. We do agree with this opinion because the histology of Synthetodus does not fit exactly the usual holocephalan one, i.e., with orthotrabeculine, trabecular dentine (osteodentine) and a lamellar layer. The histology is not the only clue for taxonomy because it may be a convergent feature as suggested for tubular dentine (after Radinsky 1961 in [25]). Our tooth plate shows trabecular dentine (osteodentine) covered with an enameloid-like tissue punctuated by irregularly spaced foramina, instead of regularly spaced foramina, as usually seen on orthotrabeculine. An attribution of our tooth plate to dipnoans is unjustified, because there is no ascending vascular canal existing in dipnoan teeth as compared with holocephalan teeth (e.g., Griphognathus in [23]). Furthermore, the presence of enameloid is characteristic for Copodontiformes [29 (p. 90)], as it is for our specimen.
We consider the superficial wear features of Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. as nearer to the ones of Synthetodus than to any other described tooth plate [29]. However, the central bulge of the tooth plate of Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. does not occupy the whole surface of the plate, contrary to all the teeth of Synthetodus published by C. Eastman [11].
We also compare Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. with Thoralodus cabrieri from the middle Famennian of Cabrières, Montagne Noire, southern France [19]. Both taxa are the only Devonian holocephalans known in France. T. cabrieri is represented by a single specimen, the holotype (specimen MNHN-DSF 4 of the palaeontology collection of the National Museum of Natural History, Earth Sciences Department, Paris), which was poorly figured in the original publication [19 (Fig. 1 and pl. 1: 3)]. It has been figured again by Lelièvre et al. ([20] (pl. 5: A–C)), but without histological information. The crown of Thoralodus has a convex occlusal surface, but it does not show any bulge. Furthermore, the tooth plate of Thoralodus is much bigger than the one of Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp.: they are 40 mm and 18 mm wide, respectively. Due to the fact that both are incomplete, and after tentative restoration of their original size, Thoralodus may have been at least 90 mm long, although Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. was ca. 30 mm long only. Additionally, the histology of Thoralodus shows orthotrabeculine, which is visible mesio-distally. A thin section of this specimen has been made [19], but could not be recovered in the Paris collections. Nevertheless, the histology of Thoralodus, as seen directly from its holotype, is different from the one of Melanodus nov. gen.
From this comparison, we decide to erect a new taxon name for this tooth plate for two main reasons: (a) it appears that our specimen is clearly different from all other known Devonian holocephalan tooth plates, and (b) it also appears to be the oldest confirmed holocephalan.
Conclusion
After comparison with the already known holocephalan tooth plates, it appears that the new specimen from the Devonian of Boulonnais, for which we propose the name Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp., is a holocephalan, except in the lack of orthotrabeculine and of a basal lamellar structure; the latter part is surely abraded as it has already been noticed for, e.g., Thoralodus cabrieri[29]. It is mostly comparable with Synthetodus trisulcatus. However, the shape of M. loonesi is more elongate than that of the tooth plates of S. trisulcatus. Furthermore, the surface occupied by the bulge and the irregularly spaced foramina on M. loonesi is less developed than on S. trisulcatus. Additionally, it appears that M. loonesi, which is early late Givetian in age and is attributed here to the Copodontiformes, would be the oldest confirmed Devonian holocephalan, if Copodontidae incertae sedis are confirmed to be holocephalans.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank three of our colleagues in the National Museum of Natural History in Paris, France, viz. D. Goujet, P. Janvier and H. Lelièvre, for interesting discussions on the material, the loan of the holotype of Thoralodus, and help in finding bibliographical references. We are also indebted to P. Recourt (CNRS, Université de Lille-1) for the SEM micrographs of Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp. Finally, the two anonymous referees of the C. R. Palevol have made several comments and corrections that strongly improved our paper.
AndersonM.E.HillerN.GessR.W.The first Bothriolepis-associated Devonian fish fauna from Africa901994397–403D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, Collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, France, 1988 (522 p.).BultynckP.Coen-AubertM.DejongheL.GodefroidJ.HanceL.LacroixD.PréatA.StainierP.SteemansP.StreelM.TourneurF.Les formations du Dévonien moyen de la Belgique3019911–106P. Bultynck, L. Dejonghe (Eds.), Guide to a revised lithostratigraphic scale of Belgium, Geol. Belg. 4 (1–2) [2001] (2002) 1–168.L. Darras, Biodiversité des Vertébrés Gnathostomes du Dévonien : le cas du Boulonnais (Pas-de-Calais, France) dans le contexte global du Givétien–Frasnien, Mémoire de Master 2 Recherche, université Montpellier-2, 18 juin 2007, 2007 (29 p., ronéotypé).DenisonR.H.Middle Devonian fishes from the Lemhi Range of Idaho16101968269–288C. Derycke, R. Cloutier, A.-M. Candilier, Palaeozoic vertebrates of northern France and Belgium: part II – Chondrichthyes, Acanthodii, Actinopterygii (uppermost Silurian to Carboniferous), in : H. Lelièvre, S. Wenz, A. Blieck, R. Cloutier (Eds.), Premiers Vertébrés et Vertébrés inférieurs (Paris, 4-9 septembe 1995), Geobios, Mem. Spec. 19 (1995) 343–350.Derycke-KhatirC.Microrestes de Vertébrés du Paléozoïque supérieur de la Manche au Rhin3320051–261V. Dormal, Sur des poissons dévoniens dans le bassin de Namur (rivage septentrional). Annales de la Société royale de malacologie de Belgique, Bull. 22 (1887) (4e série, 2), cxi–cxii.V. Dormal, Contribution à l’étude du Système Dévonien dans le Bassin de Namur. Ann. Soc. geol. Belg., Mem. 15 [1887–1888] (1888) 88–111.C.R. Eastman, Devonian fishes of Iowa, Iowa Geological Survey, XVIII, Annual Report [1907] (1908) 29–380.FlügelE.2004Springer PublisherBerlin976 p.GinterM.PiechotaA.The first Devonian holocephalian tooth from Poland4932004409–415HussakofL.BryantW.L.Catalog of the fossil fishes in the Museum of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences19181–346IrmisR.B.ElliottD.K.Taphonomy of a Middle Pennsylvanian marine vertebrate assemblage and an actualistic model for marine abrasion of teeth212006466–479JanvierP.Suarez-RiglosM.The Silurian and Devonian vertebrates of Bolivia3–4198673–114JanvierP.LethiersF.MonodO.BalkasÖ.Discovery of a vertebrate fauna at the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary in SE Turkey (Hakkari Province)721984147–168A. Le Hérissé, J. Deunff, Acritarches et Prasinophycées (Givétien supérieur–Frasnien moyen) de Ferques (Boulonnais–France), in: D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, 1988, pp. 103–152.LehmanJ.-P.Notes paléoichthyologiques38195259–67LelièvreH.FeistR.GoujetD.BlieckA.Les Vertébrés dévoniens de la Montagne Noire (sud de la France) et leur apport à la phylogénie des Pachyostéomorphes (Placodermes, Arthrodires)17119871–26J.G. Maisey, P. Janvier, The diversity of early chondrichthyan cranial morphology, in: H. Blom, M.-D. Brazeau (Eds.), 40th Anniversary Symposium on Early Vertebrates/Lower Vertebrates and IGCP 491 joint meeting (Uppsala, Sweden, August 13–16, 2007), Ichthyolith Issues, Spec. Publ. 10 (2007) 63.B. Milhau, Ostracodes du Givétien de Ferques (Dévonien moyen, Boulonnais – France), in: D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, 1988, pp. 479–491.ØrvigT.Palaeohistological Notes: 4. The interpretation of osteodentine, with remarks on the dentition in the Devonian dipnoan Griphognathus5197679–96F. Paris, Chitinozoaires du Givétien terminal et du Frasnien du Boulonnais (France), in: D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, 1988, pp. 151–161.PattersonC.The phylogeny of the chimaeroids7572491965101–219PattersonC.Interpretation of the tooth plates of chimaeroid fishes1061199233–61J. Poncet, Algues calcaires du Givétien de Ferques (Boulonnais – France), in: D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, 1988, pp. 79–86.PurnellM.A.HartP.J.B.BainesD.C.BellM.A.Quantitative analysis of dental microwear in threespine stickleback: a new approach to analysis of trophic ecology in aquatic vertebrates752006967–977B.J. Stahl, Chondrichthyes III : Holocephali, in: H.-P. Schultze (Ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology, vol. 4, Dr. Friedrich Pfeil Verlag, München, 1999 (164 p.).TurnerS.Early Carboniferous shark remains from the Rockhampton district, Queensland281199065–73D. Vachard, Foraminifères et Moravamminides du Givétien et du Frasnien (Dévonien) du Boulonnais (France), in: D. Brice (Ed.), Le Dévonien de Ferques, Bas-Boulonnais (N. France). Paléontologie – sédimentologie – stratigraphie – tectonique, collection Biostratigraphie du Paléozoïque, VII, Université de Bretagne occidentale, Brest, 1988, pp. 87–101.R. Zangerl, Chondrichthyes I. Paleozoic Elasmobranchii, in: H.-P. Schultze (Ed.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology, vol. 3A, G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart and New York, 1981 (114 p.).
Geographical (A) and stratigraphical (B) location of the studied material, indicated by a black dot, with extension of the various field sections logged in quarries and railway trenches. Abbreviations: FAM., Famennian, Fm., Formation, Mbr., Member, qu., quarry, Ste GOD., Ste Godeleine (modified after [2]).
Fig. 1. Localisation géographique (A) et stratigraphique (B) du matériel étudié, indiquée par une pastille noire, avec extension des diverses coupes de terrain qui ont été levées en carrière et le long des tranchées de chemin de fer. Abréviations : FAM, Famennien, Fm, formation, Mbr., membre, qu., carrière, Ste GOD., Sainte-Godeleine (modifié d’après [2]).
Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp., holotype MGL 1244 (Natural History Museum of Lille, France); Banc-Noir quarry, Ferques inlier, Pas-de-Calais, France; Couderousse Member, Blacourt Formation; lower Upper Givetian (Middle–Upper varcus Conodont Zone; Pokorninella bricae–Rothpletzella–Tentaculites assemblage). A, B: occlusal (A) and mesial or distal (B) views of the tooth plate. C–G: SEM micrographs of the occlusal surface and edge of the tooth plate. C–E: details showing the superficial striations due to possible microwear. F: detail of interconnected foramina. G: detail of one of the broken edges showing the outer enameloid-like layer. A, B: scale bar = 1 cm; C, D, E: scale bar = 200 μm; F: scale bar = 1 mm; G: scale bar = 500 μm.
Fig. 2. Melanodus loonesi nov. gen. et sp., holotype MGL 1244 (Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Lille, France) ; carrière du Banc-Noir, massif de Ferques, Pas-de-Calais, France ; membre de Couderousse, formation de Blacourt ; base du Givétien supérieur (zone de conodonte moyenne et supérieure à varcus ; assemblage à Pokorninella bricae–Rothpletzella–Tentaculites). A, B : vues occlusale (A) et mésiale ou distale (B) du pavé dentaire. C–G : photographies au MEB de la surface occlusale et du bord du pavé dentaire. C–E : détails montrant les stries superficielles dues à de possibles micro-usures du vivant de l’animal. F : détail des foramens interconnectés. G : détail d’un bord cassé montrant la couche externe de type émailloïde. A, B : échelle = 1 cm; C, D, E : échelle = 200 μm; F: échelle = 1 mm; G: échelle = 500 μm.